cert bootstrap bug? (was Re: definitively, I have a problem with eap-tls)

[Reveal MAP]

e: Re : cert bootstrap bug? (was Re: definitively, I have a problem with eap-tls) 
> http://tinypaste.com/5b99b = Radiusd -X output.

[snip]

rlm_pap: WARNING! No "known good" password found for the user.  Authentication may fail because of this.                    //Normal, i am not willing to do PAP but mschapv2

<me> If you’re not using a module, disable it. All it’ll do is add latency, delays and unnecessary log messages. Comment it out ...

lol,

i deactivated chap module yet, i
let pap cause sometimes i use "radtest" for test! but PAP, SQL module
will be deactivated soon and we shall see. maybe monday or tuesday, you
will have a clean log! please, stay connected to the post 

++[pap] returns noop
  rad_check_password:  Found Auth-Type EAP
auth: type "EAP"
+- entering group authenticate
  rlm_eap: Request found, released from the list
  rlm_eap: EAP/mschapv2
  rlm_eap: processing type mschapv2
+- entering group MS-CHAP
  rlm_mschap: No Cleartext-Password configured.  Cannot create LM-Password. 
  rlm_mschap: No Cleartext-Password configured.  Cannot create NT-Password.
  rlm_mschap: Told to do MS-CHAPv2 for glouglou with NT-Password
    //does the 3 previous lines means there is an error? what does "No Cleartext-Password configured means?


<me> it means, it cannot find a clear text password in the backend data store, which it expects to do ..

<Revealmap>
pfiouh, previously with another version of freeradius and the same devices and the same config, doing thesame astype of authentication, iwas sure i had these two lines and encounterd no error! but i am not sure.!

   // what does LM-Password means? and if it's error, how could i correct it?

<me> Check your configuration. All depends on so many things ..

   // ithought it was normal, as I am surewindows never sends "cleartext-Password"

Oh, Windows sure has been using clear text passwords, so it then also has a need to be backwards compatible with itself, right?


        expand: --username=%{mschap:User-Name}-> --username=glouglou //...???...

 mschap2: d1
        expand: --challenge=%{mschap:Challenge:-00} -> --challenge=4a2a69e7929b2c03 //...???...
        expand: --nt-response=%{mschap:NT-Response:-00}} ->  --nt-response=e9ea7e1669ef48501476149962484763f8f98b93fca2ced6} //...???...
Exec-Program output: NT_KEY: 067F1C60B6DDB9D2802A458C4EFE22C1 //...???...
Exec-Program-Wait: plaintext: NT_KEY: 067F1C60B6DDB9D2802A458C4EFE22C1 //...???...
//negociation that is out of the range of my brain till now, but i think ity's normal security negociation in windows system, and there is no error here.

Exec-Program: returned: 0 //...???...
rlm_mschap: adding MS-CHAPv2 MPPE keys
++[mschap] returns ok
MSCHAP Success //...???... if MSCHAP Success, where is the matter with this module???

<me> what makes you believe there is a problem at this stage?
<Revealmap
I was just showing to sergionthat i think mschapv2 module is correct

++[eap] returns handled
} # server (null) //...???...
  PEAP: Got tunneled reply RADIUS code 11
        EAP-Message = 0x011200331a0311002e533d31303435323031393932463633443944424132303644424643343341413242354132313236344636
        Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
        State = 0x95b92b9094ab31501a0a30daea5106ca
  PEAP: Processing from tunneled session code 0x81b78d8 11
        EAP-Message = 0x011200331a0311002e533d31303435323031393932463633443944424132303644424643343341413242354132313236344636
        Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
        State = 0x95b92b9094ab31501a0a30daea5106ca
  PEAP: Got tunneled Access-Challenge
++[eap] returns handled
Sending Access-Challenge of id 164 to 10.10.44.246 port 1042
        EAP-Message = 0x0112004a1900170301003f9d2524cd5e275d581a614935870e9c19c11e3a4e05332e915ef1f0a46bed9a751bbc330d98db1e52e04119a926415da6ee52cb7e6cc6693a8f1bb8847a7af3
        Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
        State = 0xe8ed0301efff1a196c3b0024d8e45892 //...???... and then What? and why its stops..???...

<me> why do I get the feeling that if Message-Authenticator is all zeros, it is a “nope, not going to happen mate” type return, effectively stopping any further processing. Why I have no idea .. Alan??

<Revealmap
the NAS sends message authenticator, but what happens here? (see below)
and um... isn't it cleartext-password received here??

rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 10.10.44.246 port 1042, id=157, length=168
        User-Name = "PLUTON\\glouglou"
        NAS-IP-Address = 10.10.44.246
        NAS-Port = 2
        Called-Station-Id = "00-1C-F0-08-FB-FA:PEAP"
        Calling-Station-Id = "00-12-F0-0C-97-61"
        Framed-MTU = 1400
        NAS-Port-Type = Wireless-802.11
        Connect-Info = "CONNECT 54Mbps 802.11g"
        EAP-Message = 0x020a001401504c55544f4e5c676c6f75676c6f75
        Message-Authenticator = 0x89dbb5baabca7b646ff74e7a0372d4d2


[cut out bits that are not relevant, nor commented, nor anything. Let’s trim messages folks. If it’s not used or relevant, get rid of it.. It only takes space]


      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20080727/05b869e6/attachment.html>