Make error - Solved

[Ted Lum]

I assume that you are referring to a build from source as opposed to an 
rpmbuild from source?

If that's the case you would want to review this: 
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building_RedHat_packages

-Ted-

Olavo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am posting this so it can save some  headaches for other people in the
> future.
>
> I've been trying to install FR on a 64 bits OS for a while. First I tried RH
> 5.2 and I got the following errors
>
>  /usr/bin/libtool --mode=link gcc   -o radmin
>   
>>> radmin.lo /usr/lib/libreadline.so /usr/lib64/libtermcap.so
>>> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/freeradius-2.1.1/src/lib/libfreeradius-
>>>       
>> radius.la
>>     
>>> util.lo log.lo conffile.lo -lnsl -lresolv  -lpthread -lreadline
>>> -ltermcap  gcc -o .libs/radmin .libs/radmin.o 
>>>       
>> /usr/lib/libreadline.so
>>     
>>> /usr/lib64/libtermcap.so .libs/util.o .libs/log.o .libs/conffile.o
>>> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/freeradius-2.1.1/src/lib/.libs/libfreer
>>>       
> adius-radi
>   
>>> us.s
>>> o -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline -ltermcap
>>> /usr/lib/libreadline.so: could not read symbols: File in
>>>       
>> wrong format
>>     
>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> gmake[4]: *** [radmin] Error 1
>>>       
>
> Then I move on to CentOs since Greg Woods informed that he is using it
> without any grief. 
>
> When I was making it on CentOS I got the exactly same errors above. Then I
> tried to install on Fedora 10 and it installed smoothly. After playing with
> Fedora for some time I realized that it is too slow compared to CentOS or RH
> and I decided to move back to CentOS and find a way to properly install it.
>
> The clue to fix the problem was provided by Greg when he said that the FR
> included with CentOS was too old. When I installed the first time I didn't
> realized that there is a FR 1.13 version on CentOS so I didn't installed
> along with the OS.
>
> This time I selected 1.13 version and it was installed normally. 
>
> Then I downloaded version FR 2.1  and  it installed smoothly. Now I have 
>
>  radiusd -v
> radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.1, for host x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, built
> on Nov 28 2008 at 23:06:41
>
> I read somewhere in the site that this is not the recommended way to do it
> and that 2.1 should be installed in a different location.
>
> If someone could comment about any problems that can arise it will be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jair Santos
>
>  
>  
>  
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 
>> freeradius-users-bounces+jsantos5954=gmail.com at lists.freeradiu
>> s.org 
>> [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jsantos5954=gmail.com at lists.f
>> reeradius.org] On Behalf Of Greg Woods
>> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:01 PM
>> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
>> Subject: RE: Make error
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:38 -0800, Olavo wrote:
>>     
>>> Does anybody know about any Linux distro 64 bits that 
>>>       
>> Freeradius will 
>>     
>>> work for sure ?
>>>       
>> I am using it on CentOS 5.2 x86_64. The freeradius package 
>> that comes with CentOS 5 is old though, I compiled freeradius 
>> from source.
>>
>> --Greg
>>
>>
>> -
>> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
>> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>>     
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
>   


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.