Make error - Solved
Ted Lum
freeradius.org at tedworld.com
Sun Nov 30 04:19:27 CET 2008
Don't know. If you look in the .spec file you'll see what additional
work is done in the package that isn't done otherwise. In addition to
init.d you may need to deal with logrotate.d and pam.d, ldconfig and
chkconfig, not to mention the users and groups it creates or the log
files it customizes. You can do all this configuration by hand if you
know what to do, but its a lot of extra work. This is why its a good
idea to do an rpmbuild and install the package. It should deal with the
existing version as well as enable a proper upgrade when a new version
becomes available in the repository. Simply building from source may not
be compatible with the previous version that's already there or
compatible with any upgrade because the package has additional things
and sometimes has them in different places. Just my opinion but I
strongly discourage not using packages for applications already in the
distros repository.
J Santos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Actually the server is running very well now. Investigating more I realized
> that version 1.13 is still there but in different directories, so when I set
> to start on boot it will run version 1.13.
>
> Does anybody know if it is only a matter of changing the radiusd script on
> /etc/init.d to point to version 2.1 daemon and conf files ? Or there is
> anything elese that I have to do ?
>
> Jair Santos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>> freeradius-users-bounces+jsantos5954=gmail.com at lists.freeradiu
>> s.org
>> [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jsantos5954=gmail.com at lists.f
>> reeradius.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lum
>> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 12:04 PM
>> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
>> Subject: Re: Make error - Solved
>>
>>
>> I assume that you are referring to a build from source as
>> opposed to an
>> rpmbuild from source?
>>
>> If that's the case you would want to review this:
>> http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building_RedHat_packages
>>
>> -Ted-
>>
>> Olavo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am posting this so it can save some headaches for other
>>>
>> people in
>>
>>> the future.
>>>
>>> I've been trying to install FR on a 64 bits OS for a while. First I
>>> tried RH 5.2 and I got the following errors
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/libtool --mode=link gcc -o radmin
>>>
>>>
>>>>> radmin.lo /usr/lib/libreadline.so /usr/lib64/libtermcap.so
>>>>> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/freeradius-2.1.1/src/lib/libfreeradius-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> radius.la
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> util.lo log.lo conffile.lo -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline
>>>>> -ltermcap gcc -o .libs/radmin .libs/radmin.o
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> /usr/lib/libreadline.so
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> /usr/lib64/libtermcap.so .libs/util.o .libs/log.o
>>>>>
>> .libs/conffile.o
>>
>>>>> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/freeradius-2.1.1/src/lib/.libs/libfreer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> adius-radi
>>>
>>>
>>>>> us.s
>>>>> o -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline -ltermcap
>>>>> /usr/lib/libreadline.so: could not read symbols: File in
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> wrong format
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>> gmake[4]: *** [radmin] Error 1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Then I move on to CentOs since Greg Woods informed that he
>>>
>> is using it
>>
>>> without any grief.
>>>
>>> When I was making it on CentOS I got the exactly same errors above.
>>> Then I tried to install on Fedora 10 and it installed
>>>
>> smoothly. After
>>
>>> playing with Fedora for some time I realized that it is too slow
>>> compared to CentOS or RH and I decided to move back to
>>>
>> CentOS and find
>>
>>> a way to properly install it.
>>>
>>> The clue to fix the problem was provided by Greg when he
>>>
>> said that the
>>
>>> FR included with CentOS was too old. When I installed the
>>>
>> first time I
>>
>>> didn't realized that there is a FR 1.13 version on CentOS
>>>
>> so I didn't
>>
>>> installed along with the OS.
>>>
>>> This time I selected 1.13 version and it was installed normally.
>>>
>>> Then I downloaded version FR 2.1 and it installed smoothly. Now I
>>> have
>>>
>>> radiusd -v
>>> radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.1, for host
>>>
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
>>
>>> built on Nov 28 2008 at 23:06:41
>>>
>>> I read somewhere in the site that this is not the
>>>
>> recommended way to
>>
>>> do it and that 2.1 should be installed in a different location.
>>>
>>> If someone could comment about any problems that can arise
>>>
>> it will be
>>
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jair Santos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From:
>>>> freeradius-users-bounces+jsantos5954=gmail.com at lists.freeradiu
>>>> s.org
>>>> [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jsantos5954=gmail.com at lists.f
>>>> reeradius.org] On Behalf Of Greg Woods
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:01 PM
>>>> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
>>>> Subject: RE: Make error
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:38 -0800, Olavo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody know about any Linux distro 64 bits that
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Freeradius will
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> work for sure ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I am using it on CentOS 5.2 x86_64. The freeradius package
>>>> that comes with CentOS 5 is old though, I compiled freeradius
>>>> from source.
>>>>
>>>> --Greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
>>>> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -
>>> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
>>> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> -
>> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
>> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>>
>
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list