Conversion to Version 2
Doug Hardie
bc979 at lafn.org
Sun Oct 5 22:49:14 CEST 2008
On Oct 5, 2008, at 13:27, A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I have been using FreeRadius 1.x for a number of years. It has
>> worked
>> just fine. All I am using it for is to authenticate and authorize
>> dial-in users (its about as simple as you can get). The only unusual
>> item is I have a couple of fairly complex modules for authorization
>> and
>> accounting. The question is should I bother to upgrade to 2.x. I
>> don't
>> have a need for any of the new features it provides. I don't even
>> use
>> most of the features in 1.x. My largest concern is the modules. I
>> don't
>> recall seeing anything here about what changes would be required
>> for them
>> other than I believe they have to be compiled with the server.
>> Currently
>> the modules are compiled separately and placed in /usr/local/lib and
>> everything just works.
>
> in your case, reasons would be, stability,
I have never had a stability issue with FreeRadius - it just works
without any attention from me.
> speed,
Perhaps, but with about 10-20 authentication requests per hour thats
not much of an issue.
> bug fixes,
Don't seem to have seen any bugs with the portions I use.
>
> new server statistics access (SNMP and radmin tool),
I have all the stats I need (not much but with just dial-in there is
no need for much).
> easy debugging
> of single users or NAS etc.
Possibly, but never had a need for that - it just works.
> the new version provides all of this
> for you - and more for others due to its extensibility.
No question about that. I read about all the new authentication
features and its amazing how anyone can keep up with all that stuff.
However, if converting my modules is going to be a big deal, I don't
see any real advantage.
>
>
> alan
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list