rlm_perl behavior

[Boian Jordanov]

On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Borislav Dimitrov wrote:

>
> On 22.04.2009, at 13:23, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
>> Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
>>> If any changes are to be made to the current
>>> implementation to support multiple interpreters (one per thread)
>>> would they show up in a 2.1.x release or a future one (2.2.x or  
>>> something)?
>>
>> They will show up in the next release, whatever that is.
>>
>> i.e. "next after the changes have been made".
>
> I suppose Apostolos Pantsiopoulos ment the multiple rlm_perl  
> instances ( modules { perl inst1 { } perl inst2 { } } capability  
> inside each thread, that we discussed a lot some time ago. Just to  
> clarify...
> Anyways that's really cool ;-) and I'm looking forward to seeing it  
> implemented. I'll do my best to help with testing.

If you look at my mail you can find that this is exactly what I said.  
Until new release you can just use an old module as Alan says.

>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html