NAS IPs
Irina
irina at nas.net
Fri Aug 21 15:33:20 CEST 2009
Hello Johan and everyone else.
Thank you very much Johan for your short answer. Some
posts have confused me even more than I was when posted to
the list. I was blaming on my English, could be I was
asking it a wrong way.
Anyway, thank you all again. I am pretty sure you know
what you are talking about :-))
Irina
==============
Gary Gatten wrote:
> If I understand you correctly I respectfully submit you are
> incorrect. When using VLSM / classless masks to define a NETWORK, you
> are correct (I havent checked the math just assuming you are
> correct). However, when defining ACL type stuff, the proposed /29
> would be perfectly OK. That said, Im speaking strictly of my
> experience with routers, firewalls, etc. If FR supports this I cant say for sure.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> you can not to use /29 for 8 IPs because 3 bits have exactly 8
> combination ,..x000 is the network and ...x111 is the difusion ,then
> really you have 6 IPs with /29, you need /28 16 combinations minus
> two,min 14 IPs for 8 numbers.
>
I think we should stop the TCPIP training.
This is the freeradius list.
The user wants to know if /29 can be used.
The answer is yes.
--
Johan Meiring
Cape PC Services CC
Tel: (021) 883-8271
Fax: (021) 886-7782
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list