NAS IPs
    Irina 
    irina at nas.net
       
    Fri Aug 21 15:33:20 CEST 2009
    
    
  
Hello Johan and everyone else.
Thank you very much Johan for your short answer.  Some 
posts have confused me even more than I was when posted to 
the list.  I was blaming on my English, could be I was 
asking it a wrong way.
Anyway, thank you all again.  I am pretty sure you know 
what you are talking about :-))
Irina
==============
Gary Gatten wrote:
> If I understand you correctly  I respectfully submit you are 
> incorrect.  When using VLSM / classless masks to define a NETWORK, you 
> are correct (I havent checked the math  just assuming you are 
> correct).  However, when defining ACL type stuff, the proposed /29 
> would be perfectly OK.  That said, Im speaking strictly of my 
> experience with routers, firewalls, etc.  If FR supports this I cant say for sure.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> you can not to use /29 for 8 IPs because 3 bits have exactly 8 
> combination ,..x000 is the network and ...x111 is the difusion ,then 
> really you have 6 IPs with /29, you need /28 16 combinations minus 
> two,min 14 IPs for 8 numbers.
>
I think we should stop the TCPIP training.
This is the freeradius list.
The user wants to know if /29 can be used.
The answer is yes.
--
Johan Meiring
Cape PC Services CC
Tel: (021) 883-8271
Fax: (021) 886-7782
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
    
    
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list