[rad] Re: SOLVED Re: pseudo-newbie exec scripts and session-time

[Alan DeKok]

Charles Gregory wrote:
> It clearly conveys my intention and my first attempt at code.

  Yes... and it clearly conveys that you hadn't read the documentation
that came with the version you had.

> So with (dwindling) respect, if you can't get the IDEA from that
> then you really are a serious waste of time.

  Exactly.  I've written much of the server, much of the documentation,
I answer a lot of questions on the list, and you're *so* frustrated with
me that you think I'm a waste of time.

  Or... maybe something else is going on.

> Tell you what. You write me off as another stubborn stupid individual
> who cannot see the 'common sense' in using the latest version of
> software, and I will write you off as someone who cannot appreciate that
> people who installed a piece of software when it was NEW would like to
> keep using that software as long as it fulfills the needs of the system
> in a stable secure fashion. I apologize for my ignorance, but not for
> sticking with something that works.

  If you had bothered reading my messages, you would see that I
*explicitly* stated that some people want to run older, supported,
versions of software, and that this was fine.

  I think that says it all.  We're in violent agreement for most things,
and yet you're frustrated that I'm explaining the *reasons* behind my
opinions.

  Alan DeKok.