update disconnect

[mctiew at yahoo.com]

--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:

> 
> > Though the exec method works but I have to open up the
> port, which means
> > the firewall thinks that's a separate connection,
> which is lousy.
> 
>   Well... it *is* a separate connection.  The
> Disconnect-Request packet
> is sent from a *new* source port to the disconnect port of
> the client.
> 

In the case of doing an "update disconnect" instead of exec, 
does it use the destination port of the accounting packet 
as the source, or it is also using a new source port ?

> 
>   And why do you think that something happening
> *second* is logged
> before something happening *first*?
> 

Because the log seems to say there was a MYSQL error,
no fields and SQL query did not succeed and so on.