Additional thread
James Devine
fxmulder at gmail.com
Fri May 22 22:22:54 CEST 2009
It is just easier and less expensive to operate a second thread since it
will be tightly integrated with the threads spawned to handle requests. I
can run a second process and use IPC if it is not possible to spawn another
thread separate from requests.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>wrote:
> James Devine wrote:
> > Is it possible for me to spin off my own thread to do background work
> > separate from individual requests in a module?
>
> No.
>
> Why would you do that? The OS already supports multiple processes.
> Just run another process.
>
> The RADIUS server is about doing RADIUS. It reads packets, processes
> them, and responds to packets. There are *no* threads except ones
> processing packets. There are *no* timer events, except those related
> to processing packets.
>
> Alan DeKok.
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20090522/ec158274/attachment.html>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list