Unexpected "Exiting normally" 2.1.8?

[Craig Campbell]

I'm afraid I did something incorrect.

I ended up with,

gcc -o .libs/radmin .libs/radmin.o /usr/lib/libreadline.so 
/usr/lib/libtermcap.so .libs/util.o .libs/log.o .libs/conffile.o 
/home/craig/src/freeradius/freeradius-server/src/lib/.libs/libfreeradius-radius.so 
 -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline -ltermcap  -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib
/usr/lib/libreadline.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Which I suspect is result of my git bisect attempts....

 $git bisect start
 $git bisect bad
 $git bisect good 9261f3e0026323b2c397af13d02fbc5780908143

 $git bisect loggit bisect start
# bad: [1489f5ffa5835e001499ee4f7a5f50a0da375613] Conf for debugging
git bisect bad 1489f5ffa5835e001499ee4f7a5f50a0da375613
# good: [9261f3e0026323b2c397af13d02fbc5780908143] Ensure that there is a 
cleanup event for proxied packets
git bisect good 9261f3e0026323b2c397af13d02fbc5780908143
# good: [9261f3e0026323b2c397af13d02fbc5780908143] Ensure that there is a 
cleanup event for proxied packets
git bisect good 9261f3e0026323b2c397af13d02fbc5780908143

$git bisect next
$CFLAGS='-O0 -g' ./configure
$make clean
$make
.....
gcc -o .libs/radmin .libs/radmin.o /usr/lib/libreadline.so 
/usr/lib/libtermcap.so .libs/util.o .libs/log.o .libs/conffile.o 
/home/craig/src/freeradius/freeradius-server/src/lib/.libs/libfreeradius-radius.so 
 -lnsl -lresolv -lpthread -lreadline -ltermcap  -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib
/usr/lib/libreadline.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alexander Clouter" <alex at digriz.org.uk>
To: <freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org>
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: Unexpected "Exiting normally" 2.1.8?


> Craig Campbell <craig at ccraft.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Regarding git bisect.  I know the current version is "bad", but I have no
>> idea if any 2.1.8 version is 'Good'.
>>
>> If there a way to use git bisect without identifying 'good'?  How can we
>> find the first version?  Can we assume it was 'good'?
>>
>> Sorry to be so non knowledgeable about git.
>>
> Please read my original email listing all the git cherry picks that I
> used.
>
> Cheers
>
> -- 
> Alexander Clouter
> .sigmonster says: Logic is a pretty flower that smells bad.
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
> signature database 4579 (20091106) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> 


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4579 (20091106) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com