current status of other client features via SQL?

[Alan DeKok]

Alan Buxey wrote:
> what is the current status of support for 'require_message_authenticator',
> 'virtual_server' and 'coa_server' options being fed in via rlm_sql  -
> I'm aware that theres ability to name virtual_server but what happens
> if the field is entry - does it go to the default virtual_server?

  Yes.

> what work is needed for these client options to be supported via
> SQL feed into clients list?

  Update the schemas, queries and code in rlm_sql.c.

  Alan DeKok.