Accounting-Response dependence
amne at netconnect.ro
amne at netconnect.ro
Wed Dec 14 09:14:26 CET 2011
Alan DeKok-2 wrote
>
> Because you only have one server. Split the server into two
> processes. One listens on network sockets and writes to the detail
> file. It shouldn't do anything else. Another reads from the detail
> file and writes to SQL.
>
I think this might just work will try it out today and see what's what.
Alan DeKok-2 wrote
>
> The problem isn't the detail file. The problem is that the server
> LOCKS, because all of the threads are locked, because the DB is locked.
> So it can't write to the detail file.
>
> Splitting the server into two processes fixes that. It allows one
> process to write to the detail file, even if the reader is down, or is
> locked for many seconds.
>
I didn't say the detail file was at fault. I know the database is the
culprit, but I just wanted a way to have packets written to the detail file
regardless of the database then written to db at its own pace. Two processes
seems like the best idea so far, I don't even know how I missed it.
Cheers,
amne
--
View this message in context: http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Accounting-Response-dependence-tp5038687p5073845.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list