OT: Written communication (Was: Re: Quick enable/disable user account.)
Alan DeKok
aland at deployingradius.com
Wed Sep 14 19:04:35 CEST 2011
Christ Schlacta wrote:
> I've noticed that many features in freeradius are implemented
> unintuitively. Groups are one example. the various rlm modules are
> another example.
*Concrete* examples. Great!
The "unintuitive" support for groups is that FreeRADIUS doesn't really
support groups. There are hacks to do groups in /etc/group, LDAP, or
SQL, but they're awkward and confusing.
I'm not sure what's unintuitive about the various rlm modules. Which
ones? Why?
> Furthermore there's alot of extensive documentation to
> filter through. Asking a general question in hopes of narrowing the
> search parameters isn't unreasonable.
Sure. "How do I do X" is a *much* better question than "tell me 5
ways to do X". And it's even better to say "I've read X, Y, and Z, but
I still have questions about paragraph 3"
> a good answer to this particular
> question would have been
> "look into creating a disabled group, or adding an rlm_sql column to
> enable or disable users. you should read the man rlm_sql and look into
> the files in the sql folder to see what the existing queries look
> like". it narrows the search paramters to one folder and one man-page
> without taking forever and enables the OP to find the answer quickly and
> easily. I've gotten similar answers before, and used them to their
> fullest.
Sure. Anyone is welcome to answer any question on this list. :)
Generally, questions with content get answers with content.
Alan DeKok.
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list