Using virtual servers to authenticate with different ports and Users

Alan Kong akongr at
Fri May 4 06:05:57 CEST 2012


Thank you for the suggestions.
I have upgraded to version 2.1.12 on CentOS 5.

I am testing with "sites-enabled/inner-tunnel" virtual server setting, 
how do I read the "second_files" in the module "files". I have included 
both "files" and "second_files" in the "authorize" section in 
"inner-tunnel". And both list of users worked.  I want to read different 
list of users for the "inner-tunnel" virtual server.

Thank you.


On 5/2/2012 6:29 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alan Kong<akongr at>  wrote:
>> I would like to authenticate one group of users using Port 1812 and a second
>> group of users on port 1645 with the intention of using virtual server
>> settings.
>> I have got freeradius 2.1.11
> Why? That's a version with known serious bug. Use 2.1.12 or v2.1.x
> branch from git.
>> Listening on accounting address * port 1813
>> Listening on command file /usr/local/var/run/radiusd/radiusd.sock
>> Listening on authentication address * port 1812 as server wifi
>> Listening on authentication address port 18120 as server
>> inner-tunnel
> That doesn't look right. Look at sites-enabled/virtual-server. There's
> an example there on how to listen to another port for authentication.
> You should be able to use that file as a base.

More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list