LDAP attribute mapping

Phil Mayers p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Tue Oct 30 20:02:02 CET 2012


Personally I'd rather the latter format everywhere, even unlang:

update {
  request:foo = 1

John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com> wrote:

>What I'd like to see is the individual modules converging on common 
>behavior so there is a consistent model.
>I suspect a number of the modules were written independently and 
>contributed, their diverse heritage makes for some awkwardness when 
>viewing the totality of FreeRADIUS.
>If rlm_rest and rlm_cache have attribute models that are elegant and 
>well thought out then let's move everything to that model. On the other
>hand if ulang is conceptually cleaner then lets move rlm_rest and 
>rlm_cache to a ulang solution. Pick one idea and make everything follow
>those rules. Consistency is a virtue and should be a goal of 3.0 IMHO, 
>it will make using FreeRADIUS easier. A major version upgrade is one of
>the very few opportunities available to clean up.

Sent from my mobile device, please excuse brevity and typos.

More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list