configure challenge..

[Rod Luzic]

this is the kind of @## () response one can see online from these ignorant retards (+ online bravery!) who wrote some sucking code for this almost dead so called protocol. doesn't get it.


________________________________
 From: Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: configure challenge..
 
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2012, at 05:21, Rod Luzic <rodluzic at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> put some links dummy- people have their own features to worry about unlike spend whole life doing this almost obsolete Radius stuff like you. how would one configure A-C. damn simple question.
> 
> and what features would those be?
> 
> I'm all for being a complete and utter asshole when the context justifies it, but insulting people like that buys you nothing*.
> 
> update control {
>     Packet-Response-Type := Access-Challenge
> }
> 
> The server will complain depending on version, but it still works.

  It doesn't tie the NEXT Access-Request to the current one.  That's
what the State attribute is for.

  And no, I won't give an example.  There's already example code in the
server to do that.  Only idiots and the terminally lazy can't find it.

  Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20120904/5155b681/attachment-0001.html>