Generating timing stats for ntlm_auth
Matthew Newton
mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk
Wed Oct 16 17:38:50 CEST 2013
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:42:57AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> > So if you must do this, please make it a *short to
> > type* and *real* control: attribute - control:RC perhaps?
As a suggestion, it might be better to introduce new unambiguous syntax for
both cases, and then set the existing syntax to the same as v2
(for least surprises) and deprecate it? "if (noop) {..}" has
always confused me as to what status it's actually checking...
How about
if (rc:module == noop) {
...
}
to check the latest module return code, and
if (rc:group == reject) {
...
}
to check the current code in the group? Alternatives could be
"return:module" or "rc:section" or even "rc:last" and "rc:return"
for the last module that set it, and the current value that will
be returned from the section.
Using control attributes might be better as Phil said to avoid the
virtual attribute stuff - just control:RC-Module or
control:RC-Group would make it unabmiguous.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at le.ac.uk>
Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list