TACACS+ question

[Thomas Fagart]

Hello

We would switch for sure. That would allow us to maintain one software instead of two.

Thomas

> Le 15 avr. 2014 à 01:10, "Andrew Kee" <adkee at oakland.edu> a écrit :
> 
> Having this in freeRADIUS would be great. It would be nice to have an alternative to radiator. We need tacacs+ for per command authorization so RADIUS won't cut it for switches
> 
> ---
> Andrew
> —
> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Matthew Newton <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:27:20AM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: 
>> > Is anyone interested in TACACS+ support in FreeRADIUS? 
>> 
>> Interested, yes, but probably not enough that other things should 
>> be pushed out of the way. I can live without it, but it would be a 
>> nice to have. 
>> 
>> Mainly because Cisco don't support checking shell commands against 
>> RADIUS for some annoying reason. 
>> 
>> Cheers, 
>> 
>> Matthew 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at le.ac.uk> 
>> 
>> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, 
>> I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom 
>> 
>> For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk> 
>> - 
>> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
> 
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20140415/f881d0d6/attachment.html>