Imminent release of 2.2.5 and 3.0.3
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Fri Apr 18 13:36:03 CEST 2014
On 17/04/2014 15:05, Alan DeKok wrote:
> That works when they pay. A good chunk of people don't. Then, they
> complain *here* because their 6 year-old distro still has a 10 year-old
> version of FreeRADIUS. And the "can't upgrade" because of "stability".
Sadly true, and I do find that odd. My leading theory is that e.g.
wireless authentication is usually a task given to someone who doesn't
really want to have to do it, and certainly doesn't want to learn
anything about it - they consider it a fire & forget. So they're a bit
lazy and unwilling to put the work in.
I do find it really very sad they're using open-source software and
don't feel they can do:
./configure --prefix=/opt/fr-$version
make
make install
...as if that's some kind of massive deployment hassle when they're
doing it on all of two f*ing servers! They get hung up on RPM/deb being
the be-all and end-all, when "tar" does the job quite nicely at small
scale. (We build RPMs but we've got the expertise).
I blame thing like ITIL and other process nonsense - those requirements
are often put in by management to stop crazy employees doing crazy
unmaintainble things and leaving, but show a fundamental
misunderstanding of the issues and end up with "only vendor packages" as
a solution :o(
> The code is done now. There aren't any long-term maintenance issues.
> So I think it's fine.
Fair enough - as long as it's not causing you maintenance/build hassles.
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list