Operator ":=" in reply packets
aland at deployingradius.com
Thu Aug 21 14:26:12 CEST 2014
Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Le 21 août 2014 à 13:45, Alan DeKok a écrit :
>> The issue is that the operators don't look at the new attributes being
>> added. They only apply to the attributes in the original list.
> Should "issue" be understood as "explanation", so that one is facing an intended behavior?
It's intended behavior.
> Or does "issue" really mean "issue"?
It means that there is an *underlying* reason for the behavior. If we
were to change the way it worked, we would get *another* kind of odd
behavior. There is no "perfect" solution.
More information about the Freeradius-Users