Operator ":=" in reply packets

[Alan DeKok]

Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Le 21 août 2014 à 13:45, Alan DeKok a écrit :
> 
>> [...]
>>  The issue is that the operators don't look at the new attributes being
>> added.  They only apply to the attributes in the original list.
>
> Should "issue" be understood as "explanation", so that one is facing an intended behavior?

  It's intended behavior.

> Or does "issue" really mean "issue"?

  It means that there is an *underlying* reason for the behavior.  If we
were to change the way it worked, we would get *another* kind of odd
behavior.  There is no "perfect" solution.

  Alan DeKok.