LDAP Groups to Freeradius and then Ruckus Wireless?
a.cudbardb at freeradius.org
Tue Jun 10 08:09:30 CEST 2014
On 10 Jun 2014, at 06:36, Fajar A. Nugraha <list at fajar.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Arran Cudbard-Bell
> <a.cudbardb at freeradius.org> wrote:
>> On 9 Jun 2014, at 15:09, Enrique Sainz Baixauli <enriquesainz.beca at intef.educacion.es> wrote:
>>>>>> Then it goes on to another module and prints those messages again. So
>>>>>> I wonder why this fails (or doesn't get to end) in my system but runs
>>>>>> peacefully in yours :S
>>>>> IIRC your last issue was incorrect server time, causing the build
>>>>> system to behave erratic (due to files with timestamp in the future).
>>>>> Have you fixed that?
>>>> Thanks guys, I totally forgot about the time issue... there were no warnings about that though (but they were there last time I tried, right?), but now it's already CCing everything into place :)
>>> So I built it, installed the packages I needed and got a new segfault... now it happens on request (6) instead of (5), but I'm not sure if that's relevant. Anyway, this is the debug output:
>> ./configure --enable-developer
>> It's hitting a bunch of soft asserts in the freeradius library which would launch the debugger if --enable-developer were set.
>> If we can get the backtrace from one of those we might have a better idea about what's going on.
> Would it make sense to enable the flag on all bundled package recipes?
> IIRC 2.x debian/rules has it (official debian/ubuntu package has it as
> well), but 3.0.x doesn't. Haven't checked others though.
No, there's a noticeable performance impact. One of the other users said it was as much as 15%.
Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb at freeradius.org>
FreeRADIUS Development Team
FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 881 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Freeradius-Users