RADIUS, anycast, and high availability

Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudbardb at freeradius.org
Thu Jun 26 19:01:26 CEST 2014

On 26 Jun 2014, at 17:35, Jason Healy <jhealy at logn.net> wrote:

> On Jun 26, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
>> A lot depends on how stable the routing is, and how many next-hops are present, as well as how your routers hash between multiple next-hops e.g. ip or ip + port.
> Yeah, I’m just starting to look into this.  We’re on Juniper gear (sorry Arran!)

To be honest you probably made the right choice, even if it did cause an amusingly large amount of political fallout at HP :)

Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb at freeradius.org>
FreeRADIUS Development Team

FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 881 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20140626/591281b3/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list