New RHEL and Fedora package maintainer

[John Dennis]

On 05/23/2014 04:53 PM, Stefan Paetow wrote:
> It could be a question for EPEL (because that's what EPEL effectively
> is… a repo for things that move faster than the distributions) then,
> although this might get vetoed on the basis that it could/would clash
> with the official distribution packages.

Sorry, that's not permitted for exactly the reason you cite, EPEL cannot
contain packages already packaged for RHEL.

-- 
John