Difference in escaping character
Alan DeKok
aland at deployingradius.com
Thu Apr 23 15:32:05 CEST 2015
On Apr 23, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Peter Balsianok <balsianok.peter at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have compared reply attributes between version 2.2.6 & 3.0.8 ( for the
> same request), i found little difference for Cisco-AVPair attribute
> (escaping \\n vs \n).
The server has been fixed to use correct escaping.
If you want a Perl string with a literal "\" followed by a literal "n", then use "\n" in a string. If you want a Perl string with an embedded carriage return, then the string must contain an embedded carriage return.
Alan DeKok.
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list