Semantics of !~ operator

[Alan DeKok]

On Apr 24, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Gerald Vogt <vogt at spamcop.net> wrote:
> I don't quite understand the semantics of !~. So far I though it would be the negated result of =~, i.e. if (a =~ b) is true (a !~ b) is false and v.v.

  It's supposed to be.  If this is for version 2, we should take a look at fixing it.

  If it's for v3, regexes no longer work in the "users" file.

  Alan DeKok.