post-proxy and detecting dead upstream realms
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Thu Jan 15 16:47:36 CET 2015
On 15/01/15 15:27, A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> "Real" cause of this message are something to worry about. In
>> particular, on some current equipment (cough Cisco cough) those
>> messages might indicate you're very close to the "offered load of
>
> thats the main issue. at least on the new releases they have a seperate
> 255 for the accounting datagrams.... I dont see why they dont use a different
> NAS-Port for each access point on the controller...that would be a nice simple
> solution
NAS-Port? How would changing the RADIUS attribute help, surely the
packet IDs would still be limited to 255?
Really they just need to open new UDP sockets when they've exhausted
IDs. It's not rocket science... ;o)
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list