State of RadSec in FR 3.0.10

[Sebastian Hagedorn]

Hi,

we have never used RadSec before but are planning to do so for Eduroam. I 
found this (three years old) document from GÉANT on it, and was planning 
on trying it that way:

<https://wiki.geant.org/display/H2eduroam/freeradius3-flr>

But our national Eduroam center (DFN) recommends using radsecproxy instead, 
because according to them RadSec isn't yet stable in FR 3.0. What's your 
take on that? To be honest, I'd rather help fix problems in FR's RadSec 
implementation than install another piece of software - unless you 
recommend against it.
-- 
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
   .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20151124/4ae7e8a0/attachment.sig>