AW: After Upgrade from freeradius 2 to 3 (Debian 8 - 9): TLS Alert write:fatal:unsupported certificate

[Gladewitz, Robert]

Hello Alan,

so, i find out that you are right. I find out, that the certificate check ends with an warning, because of following openssl function in v3_purp.c?

495 /*-
 496  * CA checks common to all purposes
 497  * return codes:
 498  * 0 not a CA
 499  * 1 is a CA
 500  * 2 basicConstraints absent so "maybe" a CA
 501  * 3 basicConstraints absent but self signed V1.
 502  * 4 basicConstraints absent but keyUsage present and keyCertSign asserted.
 503  */
 504 
 505 static int check_ca(const X509 *x)
 506 {
 507     /* keyUsage if present should allow cert signing */
 508     if (ku_reject(x, KU_KEY_CERT_SIGN))
 509         return 0;
 510     if (x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_BCONS) {
 511         if (x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_CA)
 512             return 1;
 513         /* If basicConstraints says not a CA then say so */
 514         else
 515             return 0;
 516     } else {
 517         /* we support V1 roots for...  uh, I don't really know why. */
 518         if ((x->ex_flags & V1_ROOT) == V1_ROOT)
 519             return 3;
 520         /*
 521          * If key usage present it must have certSign so tolerate it
 522          */
 523         else if (x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_KUSAGE)
 524             return 4;
 525         /* Older certificates could have Netscape-specific CA types */
 526         else if (x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_NSCERT && x->ex_nscert & NS_ANY_CA)
 527             return 5;
 528         /* can this still be regarded a CA certificate?  I doubt it */
 529         return 0;
 530     }
 531 }

But it is documented as a warning, not an error!? 

It is possible, to add an workarround for mistake in conf / tls.c

<DIFF tls.c>
	if (!my_ok &&
	    (conf->allow_expired_crl) &&
	    (err == X509_V_ERR_CRL_HAS_EXPIRED)) {
		my_ok = 1;
		X509_STORE_CTX_set_error( ctx, 0 );
	}

	+ if (!my_ok &&
	+    (conf->allow_wrong_purposed) &&
	+    (err == X509_V_ERR_INVALID_PURPOSE)) {
	+	my_ok = 1;
	+	X509_STORE_CTX_set_error( ctx, 0 );
	+ }
	
               if (!my_ok) {

</DIFF>

I hope, my mail not sounds arogant :-( 

Robert


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Freeradius-Users [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+robert.gladewitz=dbfz.de at lists.freeradius.org] Im Auftrag von Alan DeKok
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2017 18:49
An: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org>
Betreff: Re: After Upgrade from freeradius 2 to 3 (Debian 8 - 9): TLS Alert write:fatal:unsupported certificate


> On Dec 19, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Boris Lytochkin <lytboris at yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Alan, you are absolutely correct about OIDs. But one thing drives me crazy. Robert sent me a full capture (attached) and it is really weird if you compare it to FreeRADIUS logs.
> ...
> I have no idea why FreeRADIUS peeks issuer's cert instead of real client's one. I guess something is broken in server's configuration...

  EAP-TLS sends over the entire certificate chain.  OpenSSL walks down the certificate chain, verifying each cert in sequence.

  If it can't verify the CA or server cert, OpenSSL fails, and we never get to check the client cert.

  When the client cert gets printed, the fields get printed as "TLS-Client-Cert-Serial", not as "TLS-Cert-Serial"

  Alan DeKok.


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html