buffered-sql problem

[Jouni Soini]

> No, just the sample detail files are fine.  I'll take a look today / tomorrow.

could you find any problem?

I asked developer to rename detail.work to a distinct name each time.
I noticed the skipping packet is seen in debug right after renaming detail.work say to backup-1000.work
if packet is received after renaming and deleting detail.work why it exists in backup-1000.work instead of backup-1001.work?
or maybe everything is happening exactly at the same time and the order of debug lines is not accurate.

this is sample debug:

Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Renaming to /var/log/freeradius/radacct/backup-1000.work
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Unlinking /var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail.work 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Polling for detail file 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: detail (/var/log/freeradius/radacct/detail-*): Detail listener state unopened waiting 0.952720 sec 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449) Received Accounting-Request Id 162 from 82.21.11.91:18886 to 82.21.11.50:1813 length 107 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449)   User-Name = "mks8435" 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449)   NAS-IP-Address = 82.21.11.91 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449)   NAS-Port = 1152 
Tue Feb  7 16:55:02 2017 : Debug: (6449)   Acct-Status-Type = Stop 

....
(this is the packet which is in backup-1000.work and was never read by module)