rlm_rest and HTTP/2

[brent s.]

On 7/30/19 4:45 AM, Hoggins! wrote:
> Hello there,

> (SNIP)

> ... which seem to indicate that some connection upgrade is being
> performed (like for a websocket?), and one might think that rlm_rest
> does not like it very much.
> 
> Are these assumptions correct?
> 

Yep!

https://http2.github.io/http2-spec/

Specifically worth noting,
https://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#HttpSequence

It's *supposed* to be fully backwards-compatible with HTTP/1.1 if a
client doesn't support HTTP/2. It sounds like when you're enabling
HTTP/2 in your webserver, it's *forcing* http/2. IIRC, however, HTTP/2
support is *announced* by the client, and THEN the server should upgrade
to HTTP/2 (if supported).

-- 
brent saner
https://square-r00t.net/
GPG info: https://square-r00t.net/gpg-info

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20190730/b3e2c7a7/attachment.sig>