Option82 - question about sending sub-options

[Ľudovít Mikula]

Hi Alan,

   is there any estimate when it might land in 3.2.x branch?

Ludo

On 18. 9. 2025 16:37, Alan DeKok via Freeradius-Users wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2025, at 8:55 AM, Ľudovít Mikula <ludovit.mikula at mikori.sk> wrote:
>>
>> I have a question about sending Option82 - I am setting sub-options 1,2 and 9 in response to DISCOVER:
>>
>>     update reply {
>>         &DHCP-Relay-Remote-Id := &request:DHCP-Relay-Remote-Id
>>         &DHCP-Relay-Circuit-Id := &request:DHCP-Relay-Circuit-Id
>>         &DHCP-Vendor-Specific-Information := &request:DHCP-Vendor-Specific-Information
>>     }
>>
>>
>> and see it being set in the freeradius log:
>>
>> (1702)   DHCP-Relay-Remote-Id := 0xacdb489f87af
>> (1702)   DHCP-Relay-Circuit-Id := 0xacdb489f87af
>> (1702)   DHCP-Vendor-Specific-Information := 0x0000118b060104010203010000061b34030a444d5a2d434f532d3032010e4554492d5250442d504f52542d300207756e69636173740e07000100000079000d040a666f07
>> ...
>> However the relay agent vendor requires the sub-options to be set in one Option 82 block (like they send it to us in DISCOVER):
>> ..
>> Is this possible (or am I doing something wrong), we're using freeradius v3.2.3 ?
> 
>    We can push a fix, but it will have to go into 3.2.9.
> 
>    Alan DeKok.
> 
> 
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html