PAM Module Patch and Feature

[Tomas Hoger]

On 3/26/07, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
> > Is it single issue causing both reject_delay and proxy retry
> > scheduling problems?  Can you sched some light on details of the
> > problem?  Is any patch planned for 1.1.x?
>
>   Pretty much.  The server *should* have a concept of events, as in
> "when to do something".  Plus, it should have a concept of state, as in
> "the request is in state FOO".  Right now, it just brute-forces through
> all requests looking for something to do, and it does a bunch of awkward
> checks to try to figure out what state the request is in.

Thanks for explanation!  That's what I was asking for when asking
whether it's design decision or just bug. ;)

>   Both current methods are wrong.  I'm fixing both in the CVS head, but
> the patches will *not* go into 1.1.x.  They're just too invasive.

Ok, thanks!

th.