Rlm_ippool provides invalid IP

[Arlindo F. Neto]

Hi Alan,

Thanks for you help.

I agree with you, it should not be a problem, but it is! On some
systems, these addresses do not work. Looking for a way to make
the freeradius does not provide addresses in .0 or .255.

Regards,

2011/12/30 Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>

> Arlindo F. Neto wrote:
> > When I use a range of addresses greater than one network /24,
> > the ippool provides IP to the client with zero end (eg 192.168.10.0).
>
>   Yes.
>
> > Is there any configuration to be done to solve this problem?
>
>   No.
>
>  It's not a problem.  192.168.10.0 is a valid IP address.
>
>  It's true that many systems *assume* that .0 is invalid.  Those
> systems are broken.
>
>  Similarly, .255 is a valid IP address.
>
>  Alan DeKok.
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20111230/10de026e/attachment.html>