On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:28:34PM +1200, Peter Lambrechtsen wrote:
If it were me I would have a few versions of the spec file. Freeradius-rhelcentos.spec Freeradius-rhelcentosepel.spec
As then if you don't have epel then you probably won't be using redis so that module can get removed. So that with pure rhel you can get a successful build.
That was exactly my thought. I'm just too unfamiliar with RedHat to know whether their repositories were too small or I was just missing something. I now know it's the former...
On 22/07/2016 20:18, "Stefan Paetow" <Stefan.Paetow@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
To some organisations, EPEL is not acceptable as a repository because it's not curated by RedHat or people RedHat trusts.
Yeah, that's what I thought would be the case. On the other hand, they're probably the ones who desperately want feature X from 3.1.x, but wont shift from an official RedHat RPM. Cheers, Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk>