Hi,
The patch was against the 2.1.10 branch. Here are a few quick notes.
Any thoughts on adding it to 2.1.10?
I think folks would appreciate the functionality in 2.1.10 so I would agree to adding it to 2.1.10. However I would argue that would be dependent on getting the schema reviewed first. Nothing worse than having a schema get out into the field, have folks start using it and then discover it needs to be modified.
Other folks who don't use ldap would possibly appreciate getting 2.1.10 soon - I for one am waiting eagerly for a released version with the MS-MPPE fixes for EAP-MSCHAPv2. Actually, since there was a "last call" for 2.1.10 more than two weeks ago, I went into hit-F5 mode, waiting for the release. Introducing new code with new features so late, plus delaying things with a pending schema review sounds a bit odd. I'd be in favour of pushing it into a 2.1.11 separately. Greetings, Stefan Winter -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473