Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
I believe it's also supported in unlang now.
update reply { Reply-Message := "User-Name was &User-Name, Framed-IP-Address was &Framed-IP-Address" }
That isn't supported yet.
I think it's sort of dumb to treat bare words essentially the same as literals. I'd have rather used them as attribute references everywhere.
Well... the parser was written many years ago.
But apparently not requiring enumerated values, integer values or IP addresses be wrapped in quotes trumps the convenience of barewords refer to attributes.
Yes.
At least attribute references are consistent now, whether it's in conditional statements, xlat strings, update blocks, switch statements (I hope), you can always reference attributes in the same way. Any added consistency is a good thing :)
Almost... the xlat strings need to be fixed. Alan DeKok.