31 May
2016
31 May
'16
7:53 p.m.
On May 31, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
OK, I'll separate it out. I wondered about a different module, but it's so small that a separate module didn't quite seem worth it. But I agree that is probably cleaner.
rlm_pap is really for the server to do authentication itself. So that makes sense.
Group retrieval is definitely another possibilty though.
That would be nice.
Hmm - maybe mschap should itself call across to rlm_wbclient. OK, madness... would only be one connection pool then, though.
That's arguably better. We already have modules calling other modules. Alan DeKok.