On Tue 14 Nov 2006 14:32, Alexander Schrab wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: freeradius-devel-bounces+alexander.schrab=axis.com@lists.freer adius.org [mailto:freeradius-devel-bounces+alexander.schrab=axis.com@lis ts.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Sultan Sent: den 14 november 2006 12:21 To: FreeRadius developers mailing list Subject: Re: RFC 4590
Hi Peter, Alan,
Alexander Schrab and I have been working on a patch that allows to have both draft-sterman's and RFC 4590's attributes handled by FreeRADIUS. http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391
It is true that Ascend attributes conflict with the newly defined RFC 4590 attributes, so that modifications are needed.
However, I have been using this for more than a month along with an OpenSER box (pre-RFC 4590) without problem. And and believe Alex too.
Yes I have, and in a very different context too I might add.
Maybe we can take the patch in bug #391 as a basis for the future RFC 4590 implementation?
I agree with Philippe, even when the new revision comes out, it is probably _very_ similar to the current RFC (if I understand it correctly, the only problem is the IANA numbers?). Starting the work of integrating the implementation me and Philippe has done and been using would be a great start as it is already tested in two very differnt context for several weeks. It would also allow others to implement and test any less subtle requirements of RFC4590 that are yet unimplemented in our patch.
OK. I have just read through the bug history.. Nice work. What is the status of RFC 4590 implementation in SER and OpenSER? I am looking at doing a SER (or OpenSER) setup in the next few days and am not sure which one to pick.. Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc