Just out of curiousity, why not just include EPEL and use clang? I think the clang in the repo is new enough to compile 3.1.x and it seems like it's easier than installing the devtools gcc. Is there a downside to using clang? -- Bruce ________________________________ From: Freeradius-Devel <freeradius-devel-bounces+bbauman=rutgers.edu@lists.freeradius.org> on behalf of Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:10 PM To: FreeRadius developers mailing list Subject: Re: Building RPMs On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:49:43PM -0400, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
to get gcc available.
And people pay to go through this.
They suppress their gag reflex, and, with a large mouthful of RHEL dong, say, "But we only want to use the official RedHat supported version".
And we're expected to support it :( Just successfully built 3.0.12 RPMs. List of commands to run is five times longer than Debian, but got there in the end. Cheers Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk> - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html FreeRADIUS -- developers' list info<http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html> www.freeradius.org Developers' List Information. The freeradius-devel mailing list is for developers of the FreeRADIUS server. There are a few house-rules to which we'd like everybody ...