I would agree with this, however we should likely follow a more common versioning approach... like major.minor.release where the minor version number is odd for beta and even for stable or just major.minor for stable and major.minor(b)release (ie 2.0b1) for betas. --Mike Thor Spruyt wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
Nicolas Baradakis <nbk@sitadelle.com> wrote:
I'd prefer 1.1.0 rather than 1.0.6, even if I don't like branches of branches in CVS.
Yeah, I agree.
There many, many changes in CVS that may go in 1.1.0. I can't tell all of them, but it includes: newer autotools, {Pre,Post}-Proxy-Type stanzas, support of ${Cisco-AVPair[n]} syntax, -n and -p options in radclient, changes in rlm_attr_filter, new rlm_sql_log & radsqlrelay...
I'm OK with putting in things that are easy. If it's hard, let's punt.
So newer autotools make me nervous, but much of the rest of what you said sounds OK.
It would be a good idea to start releasing beta versions to overcome the "nervosity".
1.1.0 = beta 1.1.1 = stable 1.1.2 = beta 1.1.3 = stable 2.0.0 = beta 2.0.1 = stable ...
-- Groeten, Regards, Salutations,
Thor Spruyt M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65 E: thor.spruyt@telenet.be W: www.thor-spruyt.com
www.salesguide.be www.telenethotspot.be
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html