On 3 Dec 2014, at 11:58, Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:39:07AM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
On Dec 3, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
Just like the multitides of "I'm using 2.1.12" now :(
Which is exactly my problem. You can stick with an old version, and get no upgrades, or you can upgrade to get new features.
It is *highly* unproductive to support systems which are 5-6 years old.
Oh, I highly agree; just predicting what will happen.
My personal opinion right now is to have a clear "we do not support FR < 2.2.x" on the web site, and refuse to answer any questions until people upgrade. The questions about 1.x and 2.1.12 get pretty annoying.
In fact, maybe 1.1.8 should be removed from the front page and download pages of freeradius.org as well. It looks like it's still a valid version.
Done.
But in terms of -std=c11 in 3.1+, go for it.
Woohoo! -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS development team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2