Re: Maybe a 1.1.0?

On December 1, 2005 8:34:11 AM -0600 Michael Griego <mgriego@utdallas.edu> wrote:

I would agree with this, however we should likely follow a more common versioning approach... like major.minor.release where the minor version number is odd for beta and even for stable or just major.minor for stable and major.minor(b)release (ie 2.0b1) for betas.

Don't we do that already? 1.1 is newer than 1.0, etc. Please god, no even/odd numbering. -frank