17 Sep
2012
17 Sep
'12
2:40 p.m.
On 09/17/2012 06:30 PM, alan buxey wrote:
Hi,
EAP-PSK doesn't look terribly hard (unlike EAP-FAST or EAP-TEAP which
TEAP is the way forward though...its the ONLY future IETF tunneled EAP method :-)
http://xkcd.com/927/ ...nicely summarises my thinking on the matter. It has has a few small advantages. None are compelling to me, and I think I'm pretty typical. Why would someone in my position move away from TEAP? More to the point, why would someone in my position spend hundreds of man-hours deciphering the TEAP RFC and writing the code, when it's notably more complex than PEAP for little gain?