Re: rlm_acct_unique

Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:

True. I think that's why it changed for 3.0... We should really get rid of acct_unique for 3.0, it offers no functionality over %{md5:}.

Yes. I haven't removed it before now because it's being used. But changing it in a major version release is fine.

...

In my opinion, it would be better to drop Client-IP-Address - and that would be consistent with the example in the rlm_acct_unique.5 manpage.

Should be:

User-Name, Acct-Session-Id, NAS-IP-Address, NAS-Identifier, NAS-Port, NAS-Port-ID

I'll change it once I find non spaghetti powered internet.

Sure. Alan DeKok.