2 Aug
2016
2 Aug
'16
7:44 a.m.
On Aug 2, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:
Hi,
update request { NAS-Port := 1 NAS-Port := 2 NAS-Port := 3 }
Doesn't := overwrite attributes? After the above, I'd expect one instance of NAS-Port to be set, with the value of three (after its two previous assignments have been immediately overwritten).
Yes, sorry. That should be "+=" instead of ":="
Not three occurences of the NAS-Port attribute, with three distinct values? Let alone that RFC2865 only allows for one single instance.
It's just an example. RFC compliance is secondary. Alan DeKok.