On Thu 19 Jul 2007, Alan DeKok wrote:
Peter Nixon wrote:
Now, to me it makes sense to keep the CoA secret in the NAS table (or clients.conf) as a RADIUS client and a CoA server are almost always going to share information (ie. be the same thing) and in cases where they are not we could either leave out the CoA secret or the RADIUS shared secret..
Sure.
With that logic I plan to add a "coasecret" field to the NAS table (same can be done for clients.conf). Does anyone have anything against this plan?
Nope.
For 2.0, the NAS table should also have a "listener" or "virtual server" key. Clients can have different shared secrets with each socket that the server is listening on...
Hmm.. OK. I was looking at that stuff today and wondering about that. Can we call them vhosts? Everyone already knows what that means from apache... Also, I was thinking that, while we are on a roll, maybe we should rename clients.conf to nas.conf given that with CoA the hosts listed there may be client, server or both.... Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/