Markus Krause wrote:
i had a closer look at RADIUS-LDAPv3.schema (rev.1.9.6.1) and compared it with rfc2865 and there seem to be some "inconsistencies": some attributes which may contain zero or more values according to rfc2865 (http://rfc.net/rfc2865.html) are defined as SINGLE-VALUE in the schema file.
Indeed. I also think it's weird.
of course i also do not know if these differences are intended, i am just wondering about them! ;-)
I wonder about them, too ;-) I've made a pass on all files under the doc/ directory, and pulled the changes exactly like they were in CVS head. That's why the file has been modified two days ago. If nobody is against the idea, I'll commit in CVS the list of changes you suggested to match with RFC 2865. I also note there are four different LDAP schemas in CVS head. I have no idea why we need so many of them. RADIUS-LDAP.schema RADIUS-LDAPv3.schema RADIUS-LDAP-iPlanet.schema ldapv3-iplanet-schema.ldif -- Nicolas Baradakis