"Mike Mitchell" <mitchell.michael@bigpond.com> wrote:
I'll try to set up a clean install and retest, but I'm pretty sure the behaviour I have observed is as stated. By analysis:
Yes, I understand. But I don't think the *server* has a problem, other than the sizeof(filter) in the CVS head.
In earlier versions of the file, yes I agree. But in CVS HEAD (version 1.45) it compares sizeof(filter). Unless my winCVS has gone wacky. It changed going from 1.42 to 1.43.
I'll fix that.
Understood! The change may not be 100% necessary. In our case, the filters are still applied (Juniper ERX)
Ah... then it's a bug in the Juniper code. Ascend created these things, and the Ascend boxes support 32-byte filters. If Juniper has re-implemented support, they probably are more restrictive than Ascend. In any case, a module could hack the attributes to have the correct length, and do so for specific clients. Alan DeKok.