3 May
2006
3 May
'06
12:54 p.m.
"Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org> writes:
"Mike Mitchell" <mitchell.michael@bigpond.com> wrote:
Understood! The change may not be 100% necessary. In our case, the filters are still applied (Juniper ERX)
Ah... then it's a bug in the Juniper code.
Ascend created these things, and the Ascend boxes support 32-byte filters. If Juniper has re-implemented support, they probably are more restrictive than Ascend.
I don't know anything about Ascend's implementation, but this is how Juniper documents using the Ascend-Data-Filter attribute on the ERX: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose71/swconfig-policy/html/p... which I add up to a variable length from 28 to 108 bytes. Bjørn