17 Sep
2005
17 Sep
'05
2:28 p.m.
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
Both versions do _nothing_ with non-gcc compilers. I'm talking about the idea that a non-gcc compiler will implement the same thing either with different attribute names, or a different pre-function syntax altogether.
If such a compiler exists, and we care about it, we should do the latter as it's easier to extend clearly to cover other compilers.
Ah, ok. I completely misunderstood your previous reply. Sorry. -- Nicolas Baradakis